The Reald World of Management Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

The Reald World of Management - Assignment ExampleThe hypothesis X has been commented on greatly in the scholarly domain of a function in that it assumes that human beings argon inherently lazy by default and as such does not like turning (Stewart, 2010, p.1-2). The resultant of this in the real piece is the devising of control mechanisms and supervisory tools to be employ in spite of appearance organizations by the management. The reasoning of the opening is that mass work because of coercion or by enticement by means of material gains without which the persons are determined to bend working therefore, the ambition of workers to engage in productive activities is boosted or controlled by enticements. This implies that management within this theorys framework puddle to use coercion and threat in order to get work done or have general compliance by the workers. It is therefore concluded that all employees go out for their personal gains and, force or some sort of coercion must be sought-after(a) in order to realize cooperation by the workers. However, a critical evaluation of the theorem as is applied within the real life context proves differently in that people vary in the matters of personal gravel and motivation the generalization of this theory is erroneous because not always does workers require being extrinsically motivated. Personal withdraw and intrusive values go a long way in determining the productivity of item-by-item persons as unlike the proposition by the theory. Moreover, a critical weakness in the explanation of this theory is noted in that it fails to explain the motivators of management personnel, as they are equally persons who would equally illustrate the similar traits as other employees. The theory is thus seen as a tool effective in explaining the relationships within... This act approves that nevertheless of critical concern between the current scholars are the applications of these theories in the real life concomitan t s as they are seen to be highly probable through academics by rather undesirable when in real life scenarios. This paper has concentrated in the analysis of the management theories as they have been in use through real life application as well as through the academics. This paper makes a conclusion that the theory X has been commented on greatly in the scholarly field in that it assumes that human beings are inherently lazy by default and as such does not like working. The resultant of this in the real world is the devising of control mechanisms and supervisory tools to be used within organizations by the management. The theory is taken to imply that employees take pleasure in engaging their material as well as mental capacities as they carry out duties assigned and as such take work to be as a natural duty. The challenges of bureaucracy in management are studied in theory Z. The power distance theorem on the other hand was real to explain the value of cultural relations in mana gement and the employees. The contingency theorem revolves around understanding the undischarged traits of individual leaders that use to motivate and inspire the employees. The effectiveness in applying the theory is thus and evident within the academic spheres as against within the corporate working scenarios.