Nurse Intervention in Cervical Screening Programmes

Nurse Intervention in cervical book binding ProgrammesNurses deliver take to patients in an ever-changingenvironment that revolves around changes in topical anaesthetic and governmental policies aswell as tech noogy and pharmaceutical advancement for in effect(p) form,(Ellis, 2016). fit in to breast feeding and midwifery Council (NMC) grave of Conduct(2015), wet-nurses assess patients pick outs and deliver timely, efficient andeffective patient c be ground on the better available try. Evidence BasedPractice is the integration of best enquiry evidence with nursing practice andpatient needs and values to facilitate effective allot, it also promotesquality, dependable and cost-effective treatment for patients, families, healthcareproviders and health care system, (Brown, 2014 Craig and Smyth 2012). Thisappointment aims to explore an area in nursing, identifying gaps in the midst of theoryand practice. use research and discussing strength of the literature andovercoming related issues in the specified area.The assignment leave alone focus on barriers to cervical coating and nurses intervention to repair book binding programmes. cervical crabmeat masking green goddess be detected early and treatment of pre crabby personous cells and cervical cancer, (White et al., 2015) continues to exist. Cervical cancer starts from a pre-invasive st develop known as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) however, it can be detected through cervical cover version, (Foran et al., 2015). Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women globally after breast cancer, ( military personnel health Organization, 2016). According to the Department of Health (DH) (2012a) detecting cervical cancer at an early stage can hamper around 75% from developing. World Health Organization (WHO) (2015a) asserts that taproom and early detection of cervical cancer is cost effective and a long-term strategy. Hoppenot et al (2012) points out that test can reduce r elative incidence and death rates. Research shows cervical binding is associated with improved treatment for invasive cervical cancer, (Andrea et al., 2012). This highlights the importance of cervical check programmes.Cervical covering fire reduces the occurrence of cervical cancer and research shows it prevents approximately 4500 deaths annually in Britain, (Bryant, 2012). In England, there is an invitation for screening for women aged 25-64. Women aged 25-49 should attend screening appointment every triple years and women aged 50-64 every five years, (Health and Social Care Information, 2012). However, the last fifteen years has seen a gradual increase in more women be left unscreened for five years or above, from 16% in 1999 to 22% in 2013 (Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013). Research shows differences in screening is among women who are junior, starter income earners, less educated or women from nonage well-disposed background and intimately aversiond wo men, (Waller et al., 2012 Cadman et al.,2012 Marlow et al., 2015 Albrow et al., 2014).A comprehensive search of databases for literature reviewnamely, Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, field Institute for Health and Care honesty (NICE) and Cochrane. An advance search strategy including CervicalScreening, Barriers to Cervical Screening, Early Detection Cervical Cancer andCervical Screening Adherence. The search was refined to literature in the pastfive years and embodied international literatures from United Kingdom,Australia, Sweden and Korea to give an insight of those barriers from a globalperspective.Firstly, as regards discussion of non-attendance amongwomen from minority social background. Marlow et al (2015) conducted bothqualitative and quantitative watch titled Understanding cervical screeningnon-attendance among ethnic minority women in England. The pick out investigatedand compared differences in attendance among 720 women from minority ethnicbackground and White Briti sh women. For clarification purpose, ethnic minorityare black, Asian and minority ethnicity (BAME). The study instal that BAME womenwere less plausibly to attend cervical screening with 44-71% non-attenderscompared to 12% white British women. This highlights the need for moreintervention by nurses to improve practice. Reducing inequality in cancerpathway particularly among minority ethnic classifys is a policy priority (Dept.of Health 2011).Marlow et al (2015) plunge that women from ethnic minorityviewed that they were not sexually energetic so they did not deem to do the interrogation.This is an important aspect for nurses to educate in order to improve practiceand to promote attendance with readingal materials in various languages forbetter interpretation. The study also found 65% women from minority ethnic backgroundbelieved they do not need to attend smear test in the absence of all symptomscompared to 6% white British women. These barriers are primarily associatedwith lower educate and lower socio- economic status, (Fang and Baker, 2013). It is surprising that women are still notaware of cervical cancer screening when citizenry should have received letters andleaflets as part of the NHS programme, this highlights that women who havenever attended screening had not read both information, (Kobayashi, 2016).Furthermore Benito et al. (2014) argued that nursing activities were mainly inareas namely health education and promotion, clinical, research, training, andprogram evaluation. Nurses intervention to educate thereby improving associationand taste of cervical cancer and the benefits of screening isessential.In addition, participants had deep-seated personal opinionsincluding fear and embarrassment. Ethnic minority women were more promising to be grand and preferred pistillate health practitioner. To improve practice supportgroups in the community may be a good avenue to discuss about screening. Theseinterventions should lay emphasis on the efficacy of cervical screening andaddress concerns regarding shame and embarrassment. The main strength of thisstudy is information from a large existence that makes it a relevant and reliablestudy to improve cervical cancer screening programme.A qualitative study conducted by Cadman et al (2012) titledBarriers to cervical screening in women who have experienced sexual abuse anexploratory study. Women from the age oftwenty and above who visit the Website of the National Association for People treat in Childhood (NAPAC), a United Kingdom Charity who provide support andinformation for people from abusive background were invited to complete aweb-based survey of their opinions and experiences of cervical screening. Thissurvey include closed questions assessing social class, screening history andpast records of abuse. Participants indicated the type of abuse they hadexperienced either physical, sexual, emotional, neglect, spiritual or any otherform of abuse. Study shows women who have a history of sexual abuse are at riskof gynaecological problems and cervical neoplasia compared to women who havenot. Women who have been sexually abused are more likely to smoke, take drugsand consume alcohol. The study revealed that a number of barriers impeded theirattendance and esteem to cervical screening including embarrassment, lack oftrust on meeting whatsoeverone for the first time, gender of smear taker, pain,tension, fear and anxiety. The findings indicated that virtually study participantsmade remarks about the intrusive nature of the test. Some participantsmentioned they were not comfortable with interventions performed while on theirbacks. The argument suggest that womenwho have history of sexual abuse may be fearful and aflutter because oftriggering memories of the trauma so they may avoid such responses which istrue therefore this study is valid and reliable. In relation to evaluation andanalysis of the study, the findings also revealed that further training shou ldbe provided to increase nurses knowledge and sensitivity. NMC Code (2015) points out that health careproviders respect individual choices and deliver care without delay. In an event of a sensitive discussion, nursesare required to ask patient preference and should remain professional notexpressing any sign of shock. Fujimori et al. (2014) argues that to attaineffective communication, nurses should inquire patients preferences andexpectations at the start of the screening process. To improve this skill canbe taught in communications skills training which has proven to be an effectiveapproach. Nurses could show empathy by explicitly asking women about theirexpectations of the screening encounter and whether they have any concerns.This may encourage to surface issues that the nurse and patient could tackle togetherto minimise anxiety and fear. For example, it could be to provide the option ofa female practitioner for the cervical screening appointment, maintain dignityand sensitivit y. Effective communication between nurses and patients isessential. To achieve this, however, nurses moldiness be sensitive to their specificneeds and demonstrate empathy. Having nurses who are adequately trained withspecial knowledge of abuse is essential. There should be interventions such ascounselling and support activities as part of shipway of ensuring that they attendscreening. This is particularly important at cervical screening appointmentsfor sexually abused patients to deliver skilful and sensitive practice.The Waller et al (2012) conducted a qualitative studyevaluating differences to barriers among women from different ages. Thestudy interviewed practitioners inventingin the screening programme and other related charities as well as women whonever attended screening direction on their views on how age can influence non-attendance and non- stick aroundnce in cervical screening. The study found that womenwere classified into two distinct groups, which were those who wan ted to go forscreening but did not attend which consisted younger women and others who haddecided not to attend were mainly older women. Wardle (2016) argues thatnurses intervention at improving uptake could be beneficial by consideringdifferent approaches for various age groups to improve practice. The findings of the following analysis identified barriersthat included many described in other studies namely fear of discomfort, pain,embarrassment and lack of education. There is a reliable argument thatproviding support with when, where and booking an appointment is effective.Additionally one of the key themes emerging from the study is that older womenare more conscious about their bodies as they age. For example, one participantdiscussed about changes in her self-image as she grew older and how it hasaffected her self-esteem and how she feels reluctant to undergo invasiveprocedures. Nurses could encourageaction by reassuring older women and to remind them of the importance and bene fitsof cervical screening. Sabatino et al (2012) argued that effectivecommunication improves cervical screening.This imperious review by Albrow et al (2014) found similarfindings with Waller et al (2012) further evaluated the influence ofintervention in cervical screening evidence uptake amongst women less than 35years. The findings from the study increased validity and reliability from theargument that younger women are less likely to attend cervical screening.Ninety-two records were screened and four studies investigated. cardinal of thestudies evaluated the use of invitation letters and account no significantincrease compared to standard invitation. Three studies investigated the effectof monitor letters. Study participants described how screening was yet anotherdemand on their time and often competed with work and childcare, which are ofhigher priority. For others, they could not attend due to inconvenientlocation, fear, discomfort and embarrassment, (Waller et al., 2012). There wasa wide view among 30 year old women as sickness was associated with old ageand felt they had no reason to attend screening (Blomberg, 2011). Analysis ofthe findings indicate an increase in thenumber of women attending cervical screening after receiving reminder letterscompared to those that were not given, however the increase was relativelysmall. For this reason, cervical screening programmes need to look beyond theuse of invitation and reminder letters among younger women and to develop otherinterventions to castigate as many barriers. Another study reported no increaseamongst women aged 20-24, although in some places these women are below the agethreshold. However, the same study reported an increase among 25-29 (95%) and30-34 that also reported (95%) increase. It could be argued that there is someevidence to suggest that reminder letters had positive effects on alliance tocervical screening programmes. The results also showed that telephone reminderfrom a female nurse , which had 6.3% and 21.7% increase. The study also reported2.4% increase after a physician reminder. In evaluation of how nurses canimprove practice among these, age group there is a need to remove practicalbarriers and provide other incentive methods that includes peck media campaignsand educational intervention. There are so many users of social mediaespecially within this age group and if used properly it will play asignificant role in creating awareness and educating patients (Merolli et al.,2013). Concerning low perceived risk, this may relate to misperceptions of thepurpose of the screening programmes with patients focusing on detection ratherthan prevention of cervical cancer.Again, patients should be empowered through social support in the community. In addition, nurses can educate, with child(p)information regarding importance and benefits of cervical screening. Lastly,the review of GP incentive such as nurses providing flexibility in appointmenttimes and out of clinic d ays will improve practice.In conclusion, cervical cancer is preventable andrelatively easy to diagnose. Several barriers upon womens conclusion to attendcervical screening programme have been identified. Given this, there is a needfor how women view cervical cancer and make screening decision. This assignmentcollates available evidence in order to investigate potential psychosocialinfluences on women from different perspectives. It is essential that patientsadhere to nurses advice and educational interventions. In order to improvecervical cancer patient experience, there is a need that nurses receiveadequate training and develop skills that can improve practice. One possiblestrategy is being sensitive to the screening process as a result of itsintimate nature combined with effective communication. Nurses can play animportant role in treating patients with dignity, respect and showing empathy.This can make a difference to all women most especially women who haveexperienced sexual ab use. Another contributing gene is to respect patientschoice an example is providing preferred gender of the sample taker. Thiscould encourage more attendance and adherence to the cervical screening programme.PART 2Reflective practice is essential to nursing profession. Mysearch for the best evidence for cervical cancer screening interventions beganby doing literature search. Designing a research study is an advanced andcomplex skill that requires clinical experience as well as analysing andevaluating the research design. eon doing my research I focused on the needsof patients and effectiveness of nursing interventions. The result of my searchenabled me strike knowledge and skills in patient care by extensive literaturesearch using electronic databases and advanced search with combined words.Discovering how to refine my search using full text and finding up to imageevidence in the last five years. Myskills have greatly improved using electronic databases. This was done in orderto obtain relevant up to date search. NMC (2015) requires nurses use up to dateevidence and competent to practice. Such insight in itself is relevant tonursing competency and can help to improve patient care. I read and understood articles relevant tonursing practice, clinical expertise and understanding patient values. Readingthe research articles and reflecting on each one, identifying assumptions, keyconcepts and methods and determined whether the conclusions were based on theirfindings. evaluate the steps of the research process in order to criticallyanalyse and use it to inform practice. This actual my assessment skills andI was able to identify valid and reliable studies. Reviews and ratings of theevidence resulted in recommendations for practice. According to NationalInstitute of Nursing Research (NINR) 2013, nursing research is defined asresearch that involves and develops nursing care in order to promote patienthealthcare. Nurses play an important role in the National Healt h Service (NHS)they provide front line services, support patients and add to healthresearch. Furthermore, research generates knowledge for nurses and contributetowards health care (Parahoo, 2014). I am more enlightened about the importanceof analysing and evaluating research studies, which helps nurses to considermore knowledge and be up to date with evidence thereby promoting patient care. Itis evident that evidence base practice will continue to have great impact onthe professional practice of nursing. Evidence based practice is important innursing because it improves patient outcomes, care is delivered more effectively and efficiently and it minimises error, (Houser, 2016). I have acquired more knowledge, skillsduring the duration of this evidence based practice assignment and valuemy strengths, and areas that I needed to improve on. REFERENCESAlbrow, R., Blomberg, K., Kitchener, H., Brabin, L.,Patnick, J.and Tishelman, C. (2014) Interventions to improve cervical cancerscreeni ng uptake amongst young women A systematic review. Acta Oncologia,Vol. 53, no. 4, pp.445-451.Andrea, B., Andersson, T.M. and Lambert, P.C. (2012)Screening and cervical cure population based cohort study. British medical examinationJournal, Vol. 1344, pp.900.Bang, J.Y., Yadegarfar, G., Soljak, M. and Majeed, A.(2012) Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage inEngland. Journal of Public Health, Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 532-538.Brown, S.J. (2014) Evidence- based nursing. The researchpractice connection. tertiary ed., Sudbury MA Jones & Barlett.Bryant, E. (2012) the impact of policy and screening oncervical cancer in England. British Journal of Nursing, Vol.4, pp. 6-10.Cadman, L., Waller, J., Ashdown-Barr, L. and Szarewski, A.(2012) Barriers to cervical screening in women who have experienced sexualabuse an exploratory study. British Medical Journals, Vol. 38, no. 4,pp. 1-19.Craig, J. and Smyth, R. (2012) the evidence basedpractice manual for nurses. 3rd ed., Edinbu rg Scotland performLivingstone Elsevier Ltd.Department of Health. (2012a) cervical screening. Online Accessed on 12 September 2017 http//www.tinyurl.com/7gvxef9Ellis, P. (2016) Evidence based Practice in Nursing. 3rded., London Sage Publications.Fang, D.M. and Baker, D.L. (2013) Barriers and facilitatorsof cervical cancer screening among women of Hmong origin. Journal of HealthCare Poor Undeserved, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 540-555.Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Ervik, M., Dikshit, R.,Eser, S. and Mathers, C. (2013) Cancer incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARCCancer Base NO.11 Lyon International Agency for Research on Cancer.Foran, C. and Brennan, A. (2015) bar and earlydetection of cervical cancer in the UK. British Journal of Nursing, Vol.24, no.10, pp.2.Fujimori, M., Shirai, Y. and Asai, M. (2014) Effect ofcommunication skills training program for oncologist based on patientspreferences for communication when receiving bad news. Journal of ClinicalOncology, Vol. 32, no.20, pp. 217 2-3266.Hope, K.A., Moss, E., Redman, C.and Sherman, S.M. (2017)psychosocial influences upon older womens decision to attend cervicalscreening a review of current evidence. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 101,pp. 60-66.Hoppenot, C., Stampler, K. and Dunton, C. (2012) cervicalcancer screening in high- and low resource countries implications and newdevelopments. Obstetrician Gynaecology Survey, Vol. 67, no. 10, pp.658-667.Houser, J. (2016) Nursing Research Reading, Using andCreating Evidence. 4th ed., Jones& BartlettKobayashi, L.C., Waller, W.C. and Wardle, J. (2016) A lackof information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders encompass sectional study. British Medical Colorectal Public Health, Vol.16, pp. 659.Marlow, L.A., Wardle, J. and Waller, J. (2015)Understanding cervical screening non-attendance among ethnic minority women inEngland. British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 113, pp. 833-839.Merolli, M., Gray, K. and Martin Sanchez, F. (2013) Healthoutcomes and related effect s of using social media in degenerative diseasemanagement a literature review and analysis of affordances. Journal ofBiomedical Information.Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2015) the CodeProfessional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses and Midwives.NMC, London.The Health and Social Care Information Centre annual report- 2012 to 2013 www.gov.uk//thehealth-and-social-care-information-centre-annual-report-an Wardle, J., Wanger, C.N., Kralji-Hans, I., Halloran, S.P.,Smith, S.G. and McGregor, L.M. (2016) Effects of evidence-based strategies toreduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel CancerScreening Programme (ASCEND) four cluster- randomised controlled trials.Lancet, pp.751-759.White, A., Thompson, T.D. and White, M.C. (2015) cancerscreening test- use- United States. MM WR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep, Vol.66, pp. 201-206.World Health Organisation (2015a) Cancer. OnlineAccessed on September 12 2017